tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post5541893806137150146..comments2024-01-13T01:17:55.325-06:00Comments on Tom Nelson: Mark Steyn: "Unlike the obtuse groupie Revkin, [Pielke Jr ...] grasps the significance of Dr Mann's fraudulent Nobel claim"Tomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08119241500221931600noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-42676027585950856602012-10-28T06:13:16.918-05:002012-10-28T06:13:16.918-05:00Tom,
Michael Mann Retracts False Nobel Prize Claim...Tom,<br />Michael Mann Retracts False Nobel Prize Claims in Humiliating Climbdown<br />http://johnosullivan.wordpress.com/2012/10/28/michael-mann-retracts-false-nobel-prize-claims-in-humiliating-climbdown/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-28506061458359304252012-10-28T06:03:21.091-05:002012-10-28T06:03:21.091-05:00All of this rests firmly upon the foundation of a ...All of this rests firmly upon the foundation of a quite general incompetence among climate scientists. On top of that is the fraudulent promulgation of that false science by the IPCC -- which has suborned all of our institutions -- and on top of the latter is the awarding of an unearned Nobel Prize to the IPCC by the Nobel Committee. If you just castigate Mann for inflating his sense of professional worth, and leave intact and unindicted the reputations of the Nobel Prize itself, of the IPCC, and of the climate scientists who enabled the IPCC in its fraud, then you miss the real lesson to be learned -- that all of those now piling on Mann's reputation have no credibility either, in the larger, true picture, because they fail to provide that picture to their readers, and thus to the world.Harry Dale Huffmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03210275295826050501noreply@blogger.com