tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.comments2024-01-13T01:17:55.325-06:00Tom NelsonTomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08119241500221931600noreply@blogger.comBlogger16019125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-76937068000941135572023-05-22T12:41:35.815-05:002023-05-22T12:41:35.815-05:00The full collection of all Climategate emails and ...The full collection of all Climategate emails and other files can be found on my web site, here:<br /><a href="https://sealevel.info/FOIA/" rel="nofollow"><b>https://sealevel.info/FOIA/</b></a><br /><br />I'd very much like someone to mirror it, for redundancy. Tom, would you like to do that?<br /><br />There used to be several full copies of those files online, but <i>"as for knowledge, it will pass away,"</i> and most of them are gone, now. Mine is the only copy left online that I'm aware of. That makes me uncomfortable.<br /><br />If you'd like to mirror them, I'd be delighted to work with you to make that happen. My server runs Linux and Apache, so a simple <b>rsync</b> process should be able to do it. (Or we could just copy them once, and not worry about the very minor updates that I occasionally make, which are mostly just to the comments on the index page.)<br /><br />The folder is 700 MB (or nearly 800 MB if you don't use symlinks to avoid duplications).<br /><br />Drop me an email if you're interested. My contact info is on my site.<br /><br />To anyone else on the realist / lukewarmist side of the climate debate who is reading this, if you'd like to mirror those Climategate files on your server, please contact me.ncdave4lifehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05022815923433003840noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-75736023575562805112023-04-18T11:03:23.558-05:002023-04-18T11:03:23.558-05:00A very interesting paper. No doubt some will be as...A very interesting paper. No doubt some will be asking if it is "peer reviewed"warlordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17754382783071712964noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-71150690465574068402023-02-14T17:15:53.962-06:002023-02-14T17:15:53.962-06:00Thanks for what you do, learning a tonThanks for what you do, learning a tonAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-8311922237813519222023-02-05T18:41:34.349-06:002023-02-05T18:41:34.349-06:00This is masterful work. I read Mckitrick and McInt...This is masterful work. I read Mckitrick and McIntyre's takedown of the hockey stick. The three of you deserve the Order of Canada. Michael Mann's reputation should be in the toilet but these things take time. <br /><br />Thank you, thank you, thank you.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09734821106913979635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-15802224009213827542023-01-23T18:55:18.528-06:002023-01-23T18:55:18.528-06:00Link does not work for me? Tried searching your na...Link does not work for me? Tried searching your name?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-57858479087230399382023-01-04T17:50:57.270-06:002023-01-04T17:50:57.270-06:00I am currently having my mind blown by these prese...I am currently having my mind blown by these presentations that you are putting together. However, (following #35 - Lennert den Boer: “It's The Sun, Not Us”) I take umbrage at Den Boer Cold-War-throwback, sketchy notions about what he calls 'Socialism' (leaving 'Communism' aside for a moment). There is no consensual definition of Socialism but at its base it contains the idea that government and policy should be exercised for the whole community and that they should prioritise helping the poor, the weak, the disabled, the disadvantaged, etc. to lead a decent life at the expense of the lucky and the rich's desire to accumulate resources according to their whims and desires (which are acquisitive by nature – due to certain aspects of human nature, mechanisms of completion, etc.). Of course, sometimes competition of a selfish nature can have some beneficial outcomes (think of how much we enjoy sports competition) and should in such cases be encouraged by policy.<br />The point is that Den Boer’s reading of the IPCC, Greenpeace, the Greens, etc. is wrong. It is not that Global Warming policy is a Trojan horse for ‘Socialism’, as Den Boer fears (although this may be the case for a few individuals who are not thinking things through or are kidding themselves); rather that they are co-opting Socialism to their cause because Left-Wing activist muscle is useful to them (a lot of Socialists are disillusioned by the dominance of Neo-liberalism, the decline of Unions, etc. since the 80s). But investors and, thus financial Capitalism and its activists, are getting in on the act.<br />The point is that if you are right about global warming being a kind of public security scare (one can think of recent reactions to certain viruses that have practically zero impact on the healthy and below 70s and even the alarmism about the millennial bug – remember that?) then you are right –period. Caricatures about a sinister invasion-of-the-body-snatchers plot by devious (partly imaginary) political opponents are not helpful. This is about having an incorrupt public discussion about science that should welcome those of all political persuasions.<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06755160123450497264noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-51054055866627432602022-11-02T09:24:22.918-05:002022-11-02T09:24:22.918-05:00Fact 1: Remove the Earth’s atmosphere or even just...Fact 1: Remove the Earth’s atmosphere or even just the GreenHouse Gases and the Earth becomes much like the Moon, no water vapor or clouds, no ice or snow, no oceans, no vegetation, no 30% albedo becoming a barren rock ball, hot^3 (400 K) on the lit side, cold^3 (100 K) on the dark. At our distance from the Sun space is hot (394 K) not cold (5 K). <br />That’s NOT what the Radiative GreenHouse Effect theory says.<br />EVIDENCE:<br />RGHE theory “288 K w – 255 K w/o = a 33 C colder ice ball Earth” 255 K assumes w/o keeps 30% albedo, an assumption akin to criminal fraud.<br />Nikolov “Airless Celestial Bodies” <br />Kramm “Moon as test bed for Earth”<br />UCLA Diviner lunar mission data<br />Int’l Space Station HVAC design for lit side of 250 F. (ISS web site)<br />Astronaut backpack life support w/ AC and cool water tubing underwear. (Space Discovery Center)<br /><br />Fact 2: The GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from a surface radiating as a black body.<br />EVIDENCE:<br />According to the K-T atmospheric power flux balance, numerous clones and SURFRAD the GHGs must absorb an “extra” 396/333/63 W/m^2 LWIR energy upwelling from the surface allegedly radiating as a black body. These graphics contain egregious arithmetic and thermodynamic errors. See https://youtu.be/0Jijw7-YG-U<br /><br />Fact 3: Because of the significant non-radiative, i.e. kinetic, heat transfer processes of the contiguous participating atmospheric molecules the surface cannot upwell “extra” energy as a black body. <br />EVIDENCE:<br />As demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science.<br />For the experimental write up see:<br />https://principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/<br /><br />CONCLUSION:<br />No RGHE, no GHG warming, no CAGW or mankind/CO2 driven climate change.<br />Nick Schroedernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-62319033739648592592022-09-05T18:56:09.047-05:002022-09-05T18:56:09.047-05:00The question you're probably asking is if Rifk...The question you're probably asking is if Rifkin's opposed to Nuclear power and fossil fuels,<br />then WHY isn't he filing lawsuits against them?The reason is because Rifkin KNOWS he would<br />have an angry mob on his hands if his lawsuits caused these industries to either lay people<br />off or raise their rates,forcing customers to pay more for their products and service.This is<br />what seperates Rifkin from the other activists.He ONLY takes legal action against things that<br />won't get him into trouble with the people.You see,Rifkin makes his living off of them.When<br />people buy Rifkin's books or pay to hear him lecture,they support Rifkin,so he's not going to<br />do anything to get them mad at him by attacking things they depend on.This is why Rifkin was <br />filing all those lawsuits against Biotechnology.He was taking his anger towards the Nuclear<br />and Petrochemical industries and venting it out on Biotechnology instead.One thing you can<br />be sure of is the Nuclear and Petrochemical industries will NEVER have to worry about Rifkin taking legal action to stop them from destroying the planet.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-20454795109930650272022-05-22T10:30:20.575-05:002022-05-22T10:30:20.575-05:00Another example of political passion verses actua...Another example of political passion verses actual science. Sensationalism verses the steady methodical study of our global climate variations and all the variables involved....<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-14489591226978047732022-05-05T12:00:26.165-05:002022-05-05T12:00:26.165-05:00Tom, let me know if you got that list of 250 quote...Tom, let me know if you got that list of 250 quotes! I was looking for this pdf http://www.spinonthat.com/CO2_files/CO2tdino.pdf and that's how I found your blog, do you have this pdf? Let me know. Here is a lovely pdf by a Chemist: https://talkaboutbruno.ca/climate-scam it is embedded on that page for reading and their is a download link. You can email me through my Blogger blog profile page. The pdf I gave you is an actual science paper with an abstract: <br /><br />Abstract: There is a fallacy dominating the way of our thinking in current climate research <br />that radiative gases such as carbon dioxide and water vapour are regarded greenhouse gases <br />that trap heat and warm up the atmosphere. This article will show it is non-radiative nitrogen and oxygen gases that award the Earth a warm liveable near surface atmosphere. Radiative gases such as carbon dioxide are cooler than, gain heat by molecular collision from, and dissipate heat by radiation for nitrogen and oxygen.Rockets Push Off Airhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15987409213610141717noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-73204540565037814482021-12-18T13:15:34.857-06:002021-12-18T13:15:34.857-06:00They need to erase large parts of earth's hist...They need to erase large parts of earth's history to make global warming theory work like the dinosaurs and 225 million years of greenhouse periods of 4000ppm plus co2 levels when life flourished!<br /><br />When in fact we are now in a co2 starved ice age!<br /><br />Farmers don't remove co2 for better crop yields!!<br />Paul Adamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07415527418063238337noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-52639927129410029932021-10-06T15:37:57.734-05:002021-10-06T15:37:57.734-05:00Bud Bromley, thanks for the feedback.
Cause of r...Bud Bromley, thanks for the feedback. <br />Cause of relative humidity drop- 81% of the relative humidity decrease is generated by a CO2 induced 0.70%/year plant water use efficiency increase. See my paper, page 21, Botanical Quantifications, calculation on page 22. <br />Concerning Henry's law application to ocean and atmospheric CO2 concentration- Henry's law unfortunately does not apply because the liquid and gas must be in equilibrium contact, not the case. "Henry's law is a gas law that states that the amount of dissolved gas in a liquid is proportional to its partial pressure above the liquid. The proportionality factor is called Henry's law constant. H = Ca / p." The ocean on average is ~5% saturated (undersaturated) with CO2 per Henry's law at 410ppm CO2 in atmosphere and 41ppm average CO2 in oceans. <br />See my paper, calculation on page 6, Problem 4. The ocean concentration is limited by mass transfer between liquid ocean and gas atmosphere, not by CO2 solubility in sea water. <br />I hope this helps. My email is davidmotes7-at-gmail-dot-com if you want to contact me. Thanks! David. David R. Motesnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-67236040912120771862021-09-20T23:23:56.683-05:002021-09-20T23:23:56.683-05:00Thanks for your work on this David.
What mechanis...Thanks for your work on this David.<br /><br />What mechanism do you think is causing humidity to decrease? <br /><br />Much of your work seems to dovetail well with the Henry's Law theory I attempt to explain, but the references may do a better job.<br /><br />https://budbromley.blog/2021/09/20/this-fits-the-henrys-law-theory/<br /><br />https://budbromley.blog/2021/08/18/henrys-law-controls-co2-concentration-not-humans/<br /><br />Aloha,<br />BudBud Bromleyhttps://budbromley.blog/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-30869610060534628582021-09-20T23:17:49.226-05:002021-09-20T23:17:49.226-05:00Thanks for your work David. Much of it dovetails ...Thanks for your work David. Much of it dovetails with work I and others are working. Question: What mechanism do you think is causing humidity should to be decreasing?<br /><br />Aloha,<br />Bud Bromley<br /><br />https://budbromley.blog/2021/09/20/this-fits-the-henrys-law-theory/Bud Bromleyhttps://budbromley.blog/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-42398963944550394652021-06-09T23:18:12.433-05:002021-06-09T23:18:12.433-05:00This is David, the author. I am happy to reply to...This is David, the author. I am happy to reply to any comments or questions on the post. I realize this engineering paper takes time to read and understand. Thanks! David. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04844888324690216134noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-39470286076969285382021-04-30T20:14:31.555-05:002021-04-30T20:14:31.555-05:00👍👍👍👍Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05739976031319934955noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-83870102677410311402021-01-15T07:58:11.307-06:002021-01-15T07:58:11.307-06:00Obviously, I am tardy to the discussion. 2 points ...Obviously, I am tardy to the discussion. 2 points of my opinion.<br /><br />1) A challenge was given that the 2007 Bill Pranty led ABA checklist committee was shirking its duty by stating 'irrefutable evidence' as justification for not adjusting the Ivory Bill status away from the status of 6. He is the authority for a committee that is respected by many organizations and ambassadors of ornithology. The rude assertion by anonymous by name calling the ABA committee to spend more effort to complain to a Federal bureaucracy is unproductive. 2) I suggest 'anonymous' post comments with your real identity. It takes some bravado to make a bold statement with your real name. After all, the ABA and Bill Pranty did. Perhaps, in addition, spend some personal effort and perhaps go through the ABA-CLC channels to offer your own expertise to avail yourself to this important cause. Stuart Cranehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06262577685766929402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-21711291597364654302020-09-26T07:41:46.404-05:002020-09-26T07:41:46.404-05:00NiceNiceJobs Sitehttps://www.sarkariepress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-73895199266003594132020-06-03T00:42:11.883-05:002020-06-03T00:42:11.883-05:00, I didn’t find any student who wanted to engage i..., I didn’t find any student who wanted to engage in any debate. In fact, they seemed to have little idea about the concepts of curiosity, scepticism, open-mindedness."<br /><br /> CONGRATULATIONS TOM, FOR YOUR TRULY CANDID DESCRIPTION OF A HEARTLAND CLIMATE CONFERENCE THE CLIMATE WARShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02578106673226403151noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-70858144125507586322020-05-22T17:30:27.438-05:002020-05-22T17:30:27.438-05:00By the way, a paper published just this week finds...By the way, a paper published just this week finds a statistically significant *increase* in tropical cyclone intensity over the 39-yr period 1979-2017, "consistent with expectations based on theoretical understanding and trends identified in numerical simulations in warming scenarios."<br /><br />Global increase in major tropical cyclone exceedance probability over the past four decades, James P. Kossin et al, PNAS 5/18/20.<br />https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920849117<br /><br />David Appellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03318269033139447591noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-71606856097497725822020-05-22T17:23:14.701-05:002020-05-22T17:23:14.701-05:00Mogumbo Gono: Uh, what effect? (My original commen...Mogumbo Gono: Uh, what effect? (My original comment was 5 yr old.)David Appellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03318269033139447591noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-18311172135016563272020-05-21T17:25:18.798-05:002020-05-21T17:25:18.798-05:00David Appell is projecting again.
And anyone fam...David Appell is projecting again. <br /><br />And anyone familiar with first year physics understands that the temperature differential is what causes the effect. <br /><br />The closer together the temperature of the ocean and the atmosphere are, the less likely, and less intense, weather events like typhoons and hurricanes will be.<br /><br />And Zeke Hausfather is well-meaning, but like any other climate alarmist he picks, chooses, and uses only those factoids that support his Chicken Little panic. <br /><br />If climate alarmists were all like Zeke we could chuckle along, knowing his beliefs are not supported by the real world. He doesn't get personal, and he's otherwise harmless. Zeke's beliefs can easily be disregarded and ignored because there is no confirming empirical evidence to support his conjectures.Mogumbo Gonohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03410052816886887484noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-89861152812440754052020-05-18T17:40:00.120-05:002020-05-18T17:40:00.120-05:00Looks like you people hadnt anticipated the Rhein ...Looks like you people hadnt anticipated the Rhein Imperial film. That was never a Pileated in the Luneau videoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-46917984534137961652020-04-21T02:38:58.954-05:002020-04-21T02:38:58.954-05:00to Unknown, you can go to one of the other climate...to Unknown, you can go to one of the other climategate list websites and find a link that works, eg. for email 4141 you can use sealevel.info.<br />Just google "sealevel.info I think this is a real problem, and I agree with Nick that climate change might be a better labelling than global warming" and you'll get to the raw email.anon23https://www.blogger.com/profile/03778297364485104232noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-70990586368684818222020-03-03T10:56:51.850-06:002020-03-03T10:56:51.850-06:00Is your list of ~250 key quotes publicly available...Is your list of ~250 key quotes publicly available somewhere? I think this could be very useful to other people who are fighting the climate scam.Tomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08119241500221931600noreply@blogger.com