Showing posts with label climate_out_your_window. Show all posts
Showing posts with label climate_out_your_window. Show all posts

Sunday, August 19, 2012

Warmist John Abraham: "You can now look out your window and see climate change happening"

Skeptically Speaking » #177 Climate Change at CONvergence
This week, we’re taking a break from live recording. We’ll listen back to highlights from “The Chilling Effects of Denialism,” and “Who Will Save the Polar Bears,” two panels on climate change recorded live as part of the Skepchickcon track at CONvergence 2012, and moderated by our host, Desiree Schell. Science writer Maggie Koerth-Baker, engineering professor John Abraham, science advocate and writer Shawn Otto, and biological anthropologist Greg Laden discussed the causes and effects of climate change, and how debate over the science has played out in the media and popular culture.
John Abraham, at the 4:40 mark: "You can now look out your window and see climate change happening".
Flashback: Abraham surrenders to Monckton. Uni of St Thomas endorses untruths. « JoNova: Science, carbon, climate and tax
The untruths and fabrications have come back to bite him.

Thursday, August 09, 2012

Again: "just look outside your window"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/gene-karpinski/standing-up-for-science-a_b_1760154.html
[Gene Karpinski, President of the League of Conservation Voters] If overwhelming scientific consensus wasn't already enough to convince someone that climate change is real and requires immediate action, just look outside your window.

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Warmist cartoonist Tom Toles has changed his mind: Now "one look out the window" *is* indeed significant for people trying to decide if CO2 is causing the planet to overheat

Foolish “humor” drying up - Tom Toles - The Washington Post
The former bumper crop of maddeningly stupid jokes about climate change is about the only welcome casualty of the record drought this year. You don’t even have to calibrate and assign the exact degree to which this particular dry spell is caused by our blanketing the earth with additional carbon dioxide for people to finally understand why a warming climate could be a “bad” thing. Both moronic grinning and cool ironic detachment alike are shriveling under this summer’s relentless attack.

Even before we get clobbered with food scarcity and higher prices, one look out the window will let people know that lawn chemicals alone will not keep their precious lawns green. There is just something about crispy crunchy brown grass that keeps people’s lips from forming the words “If this is global warming, I’ll take it!”...

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Mann and Cullen appear in this 25-minute climate hoax piece on Al Jazeera; here are a few of my notes

Extreme weather: Linked to climate change? - Inside Story Americas - Al Jazeera English
At the 3:08 mark, Bob Deans, the associate director of Communications for the Natural Resources Defense Council, says "I called the National Center for Atmospheric Research today and they said "this is not your grandfather's summer. This is a future summer.""
Around the 4:30 mark, Michael Mann goes into his old "emitting trace amounts of CO2 is like injecting a baseball player with steroids" routine. He then claims that what we're seeing right now is "weather on steroids".
At the 16:56 mark, they put up a graphic that says "Arctic Circle Could Be Ice-free During Summer in Next Ten Years".
At the 17:50 mark, the host suggests that skeptics are often found to be funded by Big Energy or car companies.
Around the 18:45 mark Mann suggests that skeptics are like Flat-Earthers. He then claims that for active, publishing scientists in the climate field, over 99% believe that the climate is warming and humans are largely responsible for it.
Around the 20:00 mark, Deans claims that this summer, the global warming issue has come into our cornfields, lakes and bedrooms(?).
At the 24:08 mark, Mann suggests that people are seeing climate change by "looking out their windows".

Tuesday, July 03, 2012

Trenberth: "you look out the window and you see climate change in action"

What's Causing Unusually Hot Temperatures in U.S.? | PBS NewsHour | July 2, 2012 | PBS
KEVIN TRENBERTH: Well, I think it's -- you know, you look out the window and you see climate change in action. This is the way it gets manifested. There's normal weather events. There's the normal seasons.
If we have June temperatures in March, well, you know, we have experienced them before because we get them in June. If we have a very mild winter, actually, people like that, because the winter isn't as cold. But we were breaking records then.
Now we're breaking records, but we're in the peak of the heat season. And now we're going outside of the realm of conditions previously experienced.

Monday, July 02, 2012

Remember when warmists lectured us that a cold winter or three was "weather", not climate? They just remembered that some warm days in summer qualify as "climate"

The climate outside the window | News Cut | Minnesota Public Radio
Today, the Bad Astronomy blog asks, "when does weather become climate?" And then answers, "now."
...NASA, too, jumps into the "it's climate!" declaration in explaining the latest land temperature analysis in the United States, which shows it's overwhelmingly hot.
Climate Change and the Drought: An Interview With Katharine Hayhoe | StateImpact Texas
[Hayhoe] ...when we talk about climate change, we’re not talking about one event or one summer or even an unusual year. We’re talking about long term changes that we’ve seen, data that goes back at least 30 years and often much longer than that.

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Global warming hoax promoter John Kerry's full floor statement

John Kerry - United States Senator for Massachusetts : Press Room
The Senator’s full floor statement, as prepared, is below:
...Mr. President, the danger we face could not be more real. In the United States, a calculated campaign of disinformation has steadily beaten back the consensus momentum for action on climate change and replaced it with timidity by proponents in the face of millions of dollars of phony, contrived "talking points," illogical and wholly unscientific propositions and a general scorn for the truth wrapped in false threats about job loss and taxes.
...Just think about it: If the proponents of action were somehow incorrect, contrary to all that science declares, but nevertheless we proceeded to reduce carbon and other gases released into the atmosphere, what is the worst that would happen? Well, under that scenario the "worst" will be more jobs; the opening of a whole new $6 trillion dollar energy market with a more sustainable policy; a healthier population because of cleaner air and reduced expenditure on health care because of environmentally induced disease; an improved outlook for the oceans and ecosystems affected by pollution falling to earth and sea; and surely, greater security for our country because of less dependence on foreign sources of energy and a stronger economy. That's the worst that will happen.  And what if the naysayers are, in fact, wrong as all science says they are? What if, because of their ignorance, we failed to take the action we should—what is the worst then? The worst then, is sheer, utter disaster for the planet and all who inhabit it.  So whose "worst" would most thinking people rather endure?
...The conspiracy of silence that now characterizes Washington's handling of the climate issue is dangerous. Climate change is one of two or three of the most serious threats our country now faces, if not the most serious, and the silence that has enveloped a once robust debate is staggering for its irresponsibility...

All you need to do is look out your window.
...And at the Boston Marathon, temperatures hit 89 degrees Fahrenheit, more than 30 degrees higher than average. Official jackets, gloves and coffee? Are you kidding? How about hats, sunscreen and Gatorade—and medical tents filled with heat-exhausted runners starting at mile ten of the 26-mile course from Main Street in Hopkinton to Bolyston Street in Boston.
...Frankly, those who look for any excuse to continue challenging the science have a fundamental responsibility that they have never fulfilled: Prove us wrong or stand down. Prove that the pollution we put in the atmosphere is not having the harmful effect we know it is. Tell us where the gases go and what they do. Pony up one single, cogent, legitimate, scholarly analysis. Prove that the ocean isn’t actually rising; prove that the ice caps aren’t melting, that deserts aren’t expanding. And prove that human beings have nothing to do with any of it.
And by the way—good luck in the effort! Because there are over 6,000 peer-reviewed articles, all of which document clearly and irrefutably the ways in which mankind is contributing to this problem. Sure we know the naysayers have their two-bit scientists who trade in doubt and misdirection about things like sun spots and clouds. But there’s not a single credible scientist that will argue climate change isn’t happening.
...I want to take a moment to drill down on the science—on the cold, hard, stubborn facts that must guide us in addressing this challenge. I know it’s detailed, but it’s the very detail detractors can never address or refute and it’s important to see the detail in all its cumulative force. Unlike the naysayers, I will respond point by point to the falsehoods and lay out a summary of critical evidence that should lead America—and the world—to action.  [Via Mark T]

Friday, July 22, 2011

Grist editorial intern Claire Thompson on how she knows that CO2 causes bad weather: "hell -- look out the window "

Minor threat: Our lame response to climate change | Grist
The U.S. military recognizes climate change as a serious threat to national security. The CIA has established a Center for the Study of Climate Change. The scientific community is in widespread agreement that climate change is happening, that it's caused by human activity, and that its catastrophic effects -- such as a sea-level rise of at least a meter -- will be felt within our lifetimes (hell -- look out the window). But compared to other security threats with less clear-cut causes and solutions, the U.S. government has expended relatively far fewer resources to address the risks of climate change.
...
Claire Thompson is an editorial intern at Grist.
Note to Claire: I just looked out the window, and I'm *still* not convinced.