Saturday, January 15, 2011

Popular 850 Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skepticism of "Man-Made" Global Warming (AGW) Alarm
The following papers support skepticism of AGW or the negative environmental or socio-economic effects of AGW.
Capital Weather Gang - Does snow cover extent debunk global warming?
Snow cover extent declines have been pronounced in spring, whereas the trend in winter and fall has been relatively flat.
Unequivocal Equivocation | Watts Up With That?
In climate science, the AGW hypothesis states that human GHG emissions significantly affect the climate. As such, the null hypothesis is that human GHG emissions do not significantly affect the climate, that the climate variations are the result of natural processes. This null hypothesis is what Doctor T wants to reverse.

As Steve McIntyre has often commented, with these folks you really have to keep your eye on the pea under the walnut shell. These folks seem to have sub-specialties in the “three-card monte” sub-species of science. Did you notice when the pea went from under one walnut shell to another in Dr. T’s quotation above? Take another look at it.

No comments: