tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post2371712773416638929..comments2024-01-13T01:17:55.325-06:00Comments on Tom Nelson: Warmist James Balog suggests that if you don't believe that CO2 causes bad weather, you are a "far out fanatic" financed by "wealthy crackpots"Tomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08119241500221931600noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-61577423460900819642013-06-10T11:52:23.215-05:002013-06-10T11:52:23.215-05:00Balog says "...what really struck me with gre...Balog says "...what really struck me with great force is that the kind of people who are fuelling this debate are often the kinds of far out fanatics that would not have had a voice to do anything other than distribute pamphlets on a street corner 30 or 40 years ago."<br /><br />That sounds like a pretty good description of Hansen, Mann and much of the CAGW crowd to me.Joe Freemannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-1668457698152044972013-06-10T08:16:22.937-05:002013-06-10T08:16:22.937-05:00And the post is behind a pay wall. Hmmmm.... says...And the post is behind a pay wall. Hmmmm.... says it all<br />Jeffrey Murphyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03248593816718636390noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-83269833348976618512013-06-10T05:49:19.183-05:002013-06-10T05:49:19.183-05:0040 years ago, the strong "scientific consensu...40 years ago, the strong "scientific consensus" was that the earth was heading for a new ice age. <br /><br />Who were the crackpot nutcases back then? <br /><br />Perhaps the "crackpot nutcases"(those scientists that did not blindly follow the consensus, and the money) were the real heros during both the prior and the current climate debate.<br /><br />When did questioning scientific dogma become so intolerable?<br /><br />Mr. Balog, your language demeans you. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com