tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post2740931775742100010..comments2024-01-13T01:17:55.325-06:00Comments on Tom Nelson: Warmist David Appell on losing his religion: "it does raise questions about how much purported unanimity has been artificially created by IPCC reports, and whether the full state of uncertainty is being communicated...The would-be policy makers need to stop getting ahead of the science"Tomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08119241500221931600noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-31336544842866079502011-12-10T00:17:22.098-06:002011-12-10T00:17:22.098-06:00SBVOR: Do changes in the AMO phase account for the...SBVOR: Do changes in the AMO phase account for the large increase in total ocean heat content of about 22 x 10^22 J, as shown on http://www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/3M_HEAT_CONTENT/ ?<br /><br />If so, where has this heat come from?David Appellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03318269033139447591noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-10194706257334481112011-12-10T00:14:35.070-06:002011-12-10T00:14:35.070-06:00Anon 7:29 pm -- what is the citation to Newell'...Anon 7:29 pm -- what is the citation to Newell's paper?David Appellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03318269033139447591noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-88809437193623978292011-12-01T13:24:38.156-06:002011-12-01T13:24:38.156-06:00Don't count on Comrade Appell losing his relig...Don't count on Comrade Appell losing his religion anytime soon (or, ever).<br /><br />He's a lifer.SBVORhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02393495680438358951noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-46223671299069036872011-11-29T03:47:21.002-06:002011-11-29T03:47:21.002-06:00David Appell remains a warmist stooge.
His talk ...David Appell remains a warmist stooge. <br /><br />His talk of a "Thermidorian Reaction" in climate science is akin to Anthony Weiner saying Dems should rethink Obamacare -- a couple months before it was rammed through. <br /><br />"I'm not going to even mention some prominent deniers because they're clearly fools" -D AppellContrapundithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14589317029999584254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-77115024416993721672011-11-28T19:29:51.966-06:002011-11-28T19:29:51.966-06:00Appell should read Reginald Newell's paper fro...Appell should read Reginald Newell's paper from the 1970s where he deduced that a doubling of CO2 would cause a 0.25 C warming. There is a good chance he was correct. I believe he was fired for reaching this conclusion, so the AGW scientists have been nasty for a long time.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com