tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post2826039409673373712..comments2024-01-13T01:17:55.325-06:00Comments on Tom Nelson: Hockenberry digs in deeper: Now he suggests that there is a difference between "skeptics" and "scientists"; also says scientific questioning and doubt gets exploited as "debate" and "uncertainty"Tomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08119241500221931600noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-48166827598132230092012-10-25T16:56:32.714-05:002012-10-25T16:56:32.714-05:00While he apparently avoided my specific question i...While he apparently avoided my specific question in that Live Chat about "re '... until the fire is in the stairwell.' Did you approach this story from this angle when you began, i.e. the issue as settled science, or were you unsure or unaware of the scope of skeptic climate scientists' assessments and wanted to simply find out more, and your research during this project convinced you there is this 'fire is in the stairwell'?"<br /><br />.... along with 13 of my other questions: https://twitter.com/questionAGW/status/261553329702854656Russell Chttp://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/thread-1939-post-11632.html#pid11632noreply@blogger.com