tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post3819429052675774039..comments2024-01-13T01:17:55.325-06:00Comments on Tom Nelson: Read the whole thing: A year after it exploded in their face, clueless journalists still don't recognize that they overlooked the greatest scientific hoax in historyTomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08119241500221931600noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-69215969085493314712010-11-27T11:14:23.002-06:002010-11-27T11:14:23.002-06:00"The basic science" is in fact still bei..."The basic science" is in fact still being investigated. The only thing that is totally, completely settled is that the CO2-driven catastrophic warming hypothesis is totally disconfirmed by <i>all</i> actual observations, thus demonstrating that it is every bit as silly and implausible as many of us said it was twenty years ago.<br /><br />Disband the IPCC, defund the research (except for the buoys and satellites), open up the data, close down CRU and GISS, and for God's sake decommission and scrap all the damned wind turbines.<br /><br />And make 2 years of basic science a requirement in the journalism schools.Craig Goodrichhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07751837397879574986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-53299256002632345452010-11-25T16:11:49.491-06:002010-11-25T16:11:49.491-06:00Brainard could use a brain (but that's J-schoo...Brainard could use a brain (but that's J-school for ya):"reporters must defend those scientists that need defending because many, such as Ben Santer, have had to endure unreasonable challenges to their credibility in addition to overt threats of violence."<br /><br />It was Santer who threatened to beat up dissenting climatologist Pat Michaels - not the other way around. As per the emails he ought to have read.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-29038276403191071932010-11-25T15:12:42.365-06:002010-11-25T15:12:42.365-06:00Harris: "The “climategate” story..."
EX...Harris: "The “climategate” story..."<br /><br />EXCEPT in the US, where it wasn't an actual 'story' so much as the 800 pound gorilla nobody (among the 'elites' and anointed chattering classes, anyway) would talk about.<br /><br />Only the internet SHOWED people that the many claims skeptics had made about the CAGW industry were actually true. <br /><br />Too bad these dinosaur's cannot learn. But then, again, a local J-school with its Andrew Revkin worshiping "science journalism" prof may be folded into other schools at CU-Boulder....can you say 'outsourced'? Sure ya can!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-17550479286997030282010-11-25T12:59:45.122-06:002010-11-25T12:59:45.122-06:00Quote: "Surely we couldn’t still be arguing t...Quote: "Surely we couldn’t still be arguing the basic science in 2009 and 2010"<br /><br />No, surely not. Do we really still allow debate, argument and free-thinking in science? <br /><br />Guards! Guards! This scientist is asking questions - take him away!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-55496053331299449272010-11-25T11:54:21.741-06:002010-11-25T11:54:21.741-06:00Hope the new congress will defund NPR.
Thelameduck...Hope the new congress will defund NPR.<br />Thelameduck would not do it but next year is coming.MikeSnowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12462825086786614647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-78492333841838386572010-11-25T10:28:14.378-06:002010-11-25T10:28:14.378-06:00There's one whole other side of AGW besides Cl...There's one whole other side of AGW besides ClimateGate that the journalists overlooked: the voracity of the accusation of corruption made against skeptic scientists by one of their own - a guy who they all say is a "Pulitzer winner".<br /><br />Please see: "The '96-to-present smear of skeptic scientists" http://climategatecountryclub.com/profiles/blogs/the-96topresent-smear-of/<br /><br />Seems rather unlikely you'll see any of that being reported by any of the clueless journalists...Russell C.https://www.blogger.com/profile/09025000969211713024noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-33076717037135880732010-11-25T02:50:52.115-06:002010-11-25T02:50:52.115-06:00Yeah, "You can't fix stupid."
The g...Yeah, "You can't fix stupid."<br /><br />The good news is that you <b><i>can</i></b> "fix" the ex-Journalism school clowns.<br /><br />Keep 'em from breeding new specimens, anyway. Gotta look to some extraordinary measures to keep the gene pool from going down the tubes. <br />--Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-30972295604308229312010-11-25T00:52:55.753-06:002010-11-25T00:52:55.753-06:00Scientific "hoax"? Get real.Scientific "hoax"? Get real.Jim Ackerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03214856789697943841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-9312887571385351572010-11-24T21:42:52.598-06:002010-11-24T21:42:52.598-06:00The problem with climate journalists --
"You...The problem with climate journalists -- <br />"You can't fix stupid."<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gxKStPXyn8Stanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01575178552426939685noreply@blogger.com