tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post9086054253212248683..comments2024-01-13T01:17:55.325-06:00Comments on Tom Nelson: UC Berkeley professor criticizes warmists Al Gore and Tom FriedmanTomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08119241500221931600noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-9668255196553340772011-06-10T10:52:43.928-05:002011-06-10T10:52:43.928-05:00.. Sure, 1/2 of global warming occurred before hum..... Sure, 1/2 of global warming occurred before human industrialization appeared on the scene, but that's NOT the worry, that was thousands of years... the concern is that the other 1/2 occurred in the BRIEF period AFTERWARDS and is accelerating rapidly now...!!!BuzzLOLhttp://BuzzLOL1@yahoo.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-59915613880757416992011-02-11T10:14:07.763-06:002011-02-11T10:14:07.763-06:00A great deal of fuss about very little. The profes...A great deal of fuss about very little. The professor's already told us what the conclusion's gonna be: about half a degree of warming over the last century. Does he really think that fact alone is the source of the controversy?FirkinRidiculousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-24014516386074357762011-02-11T10:04:25.400-06:002011-02-11T10:04:25.400-06:00The new study is going to be the "irrefutable...The new study is going to be the "irrefutable" temperature record eh?<br /><br />After Anthony Watts showed just how many temperature recording stations were in dodgy locations (next to air conditioners or aircraft runways etc) it can only be a rehash of dodgy data.Anthony Hanwellnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12339127.post-55790597839164109772011-02-11T09:44:47.438-06:002011-02-11T09:44:47.438-06:00I agree with all the professors say except that th...I agree with all the professors say except that they do not quantify the amount of warming due to human activity. I think it has been order of 0.2 C to 0.3 C at most, due to CO2 and methane and land use, but the rest of the warming is likely recovery from the LIA and some error due to bad data. Since about half of the indicated warming occurred before CO2 and methane had increased much, it is almost certain the human component is not much larger than that. If that is so, there is no problem at all.Leonard Weinsteinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02125857972902059097noreply@blogger.com