Climategate: but why these debates only now? | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog

CNN holds another debate of the kind the ABC finds almost impossible - and which we should have been holding for years before this Copenhagen summit.

[I blame Rush Limbaugh]: Aussie CEOs sceptical about climate change agreement | Dynamic Business

The Executive Connection (TEC) poll of 354 Australian business leaders and CEOs conducted in December 2009 found that 60 percent believe a failure to reach agreement in Copenhagen would have no impact on Australia, and 14 percent said failure to reach an agreement would actually have a positive impact on the nation’s business community.

Instapundit » Blog Archive

BRUCE BAWER: Dateline Copenhagen: Excess & Waste Define Climate Conference.

Laura Speaks Out (a polite thread) « the Air Vent

[Matt Pearson] As a former software developer for Microsoft ( for 12 years ), I am not so much interested in the emails. ( Though they do provide much needed context ). I am interested in the code, and the harry.txt file. This cannot be taken out of context. I am curious if Laura has any comments on the quality of the code, or the travails of Harry. As she has spent time in the climate science field, and I have only spent 20 plus years as a professional software developer, her insights into how development of the climate modeling software would be very much appreciated.

ClimateGate: Was Data Faked? - Megan McArdle

That is the actual worrying question about CRU, and GISS, and the other scientists working on paleoclimate reconstruction: that they may all be calibrating their findings to each other. That when you get a number that looks like CRU, you don't look so hard to figure out whether it's incorrect as you do when you get a number that doesn't look like CRU--and maybe you adjust the numbers you have to look more like the other "known" datasets. There is always a way to find what you're expecting to find if you look hard enough.