Pages

Thursday, April 26, 2012

All can agree on green energy, but the rest is alarmist

[Nick Minchin] Conversely, neither Anna, nor those whom Anna took me to meet, could convince me that human emissions of CO2 are driving dangerous global warming.

What I have learnt about science recently is that it is dynamic, that there are always unknowns and that there is in particular much that we don't know about the Earth's climate.

May the debate continue.

Natural climate change does more good than damage | Tulsa Beacon

Though it would be interesting and probably revealing to get the documents and prove Mann’s data to be wrong, intentional or not, to me the real issue is why we are not looking at the facts of climate change, and call it what it is – natural climate change. Furthermore, natural climate change could do far more good for us than we currently think, if only we can get the scientists and politicians to do what is right. What wonders of science and human ingenuity are we missing because we are being forced to believe a hoax?

Climate change debate has moved on – Blog – ABC Environment (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

ACCORDING TO THE Lowy Institute's annual poll, Australians are losing their conviction on climate change. The last poll, published in June 2011 showed that just 41 per cent of those polled agreed with the statement, "Global warming is a serious and pressing problem. We should begin taking steps now even if this involves significant costs" down from a whopping 68 per cent in 2006.

EU climate [scam] chief ‘curious’ to see Obama’s plan - The Hill's E2-Wire

James Inhoffe | EPA | Crucify | The Daily Caller

According to Inhofe, however, the EPA’s actions speak louder than Armendariz’s and Giles’ words.

“Of course they’re not [focused ‘fair and effective enforcement],’” Inhofe said in reaction to Giles’ words. “How can it be fair when they come in and make the accusations without developing the case, without having the evidence, and take enforcement actions that would put the company out of business — when they don’t have the evidence to back that up?”

“Their mission is to put people out of business,” Inhofe added. “Their mission is to kill hydraulic fracturing.”

No comments:

Post a Comment