Job Offer: Students Wanted To Be IPCC Climate Change Reviewers

Maybe I am jumping to conclusions, but with all of the mess of the last IPCC Assessment Report (including a non-scientific WWF campaign document predicting the disappearance of Himalayan glaciers getting through the review process and becoming one of the IPCC’s main conclusions), shouldn’t they try to do a more rigorous review process this time around?

Committee On Climate Change VS Mail On Sunday | The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF)

If this kind of data were from a drugs trial it would have been stopped long ago, even allowing for the little understood stopping bias effect which occurs when looking for the first signs of effectiveness or harm in such trials.

Matt Ridley: Weird Weather? That’s The Pub Bore Forecast | The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF)

Forget the anecdotes and face the facts: weather always fluctuates. Arctic springs and angry summers are not oddities.

Sham journals scam authors : Nature News & Comment

Researchers who have submitted to the fake journals pay dearly. Both the counterfeit Archives des Sciences and the fake Wulfenia charge author fees of more than $500, with instructions to address payment to accounts at two banks in Yerevan, Armenia.

New Statistical Guidelines Issued | Real Science

The hockey team now requires that the left side of all graphs begins during a La Nina, and the right side ends during an El Nino.
All data must be tampered with by NOAA and GISS before release.
If the data doesn’t match the theory, then make up some crap about ocean acidification.