Responding to the CJR’s ‘Attack of the Climate Denial Books’

How does it follow that such books are labeled “climate-denials” when they go to great length citing material, including peer-reviewed science journal-published papers, in telling how skeptic climate scientists claim the IPCC has not conclusively made its case that human-induced greenhouse gases are the primary driver of global warming? Why does that not merit the label “plausible skepticism”?

Twitter / DeSmogBlog

You deserve a movie date this wknd with #GreedyLyingBastards http://ht.ly/iXaVI  Take action http://ht.ly/iXblq  #climate #film

Check out Climate Depot's coverage of Climategate 3.0 page | Climate Depot