[Great stuff : Dave Crank finds your correspondent wrong | The SPPI Blog

Here, in italics, paragraph by paragraph, is a letter from Dave Crank, who disagrees with what I have said about the climate and the Copenhagen agreement, together with my reply to each paragraph, in Roman face.

Another Powerful Email from Climategate « the Air Vent

Keith may have changed his mind on ALL of the points in this email, but half the SKEPTIC arguments were made by Keith Briffa over ten years ago in a private email – pre Wegman. The whole thing makes me wonder if team pressure has pushed an otherwise blunt and honest Doc into some unusual positions.  [Has any journalist attempted to contact Briffa for comments on ClimateGate?]

American Thinker: Climategate and Government-Driven Science

There are many lessons we can learn from Climategate. Environmentalism has become an intolerant religion rather than a rational movement seeking limited goals; the unsavory priests of environmentalism have no qualms about tricking people; and these fanatical clerics also preside over an inquisition of those who profess a different sort of climate study from the one which has become the formal dogma of the faith.

Climategate: ordering a better scare for the colonials

The exchange and comments presented below by Andrew Bolt include something that is really explosive for anyone with the most basic knowledge of statistics. The Warmist scientist has undertaken to present changes that are not statistically significant (i.e. random changes) as if they WERE statistically significant. See the update at the foot of the article. Once again we see a total lack of scientific integrity among Warmists. The UEA is just a propaganda institution. It's not a real university's anus

UK Met Office Madness: 10 years to “save the world” | Australian Climate Madness

When I was growing up in the UK, the Met Office was the centre of cool-headed, scientific thinking. As a kid I used to listen to the Shipping Forecast and plot synoptic charts from the observations. So much has changed. The Met Office is now the centre for hysterical climate alarmism, devoid of any scientific impartiality, it is now just a political mouthpiece, as evidenced by its latest rant:

Global warming, fantasy football and secular religions

You saw that by showing a short period of time, the data makes global warming look unusual and alarming. You also saw that by looking at longer periods of time, what is happening today does not seem very exceptional.

Chaosenhagen - Greg Pollowitz - Planet Gore on National Review Online

The talks have been temporarily suspended

Warning Signs: A Gallery of Climategate Cartoons