Cornell's Luneau video analysis is now available here.
In no particular order, here are some of my first impressions of this analysis:
1. Amazingly, they are still defending the "six-pixel bird", with no mention of it probably being a branch stub.
2. To me, their Pileated Clip 11 looks quite similar to the Luneau bird. As an experiment, if you told a number of "believers" that this was a clip from the Luneau video, I'd be willing to bet that a large percentage would express confidence that Clip 11 shows an Ivory-bill, based on both fieldmarks and "jizz".
3. They show us a video of a Franklin's Gull, leisurely flying away. This is supposed to "prove" that a fleeing Pileated's dorsal wing surface should be prominently visible when viewed from behind.
This comparison makes no sense to me. Instead of admitting that their stiff-winged Pileated re-enactment model was seriously flawed, they went far afield to find a species where a stiff-winged model might have been more reasonable.
4. In my view, this is unrelated to the video analysis, but is notable: "... a few molting pileateds showing some extra white on the wing have been spotted in the Big Woods region of Arkansas".
Green Energy Cabal Blind to Africa’s Medical Horror Show
54 minutes ago