E.P.A. Expected to Regulate Carbon Dioxide and Other Heat-Trapping Gases - NYTimes.com
If the environmental agency determines that carbon dioxide is a dangerous pollutant to be regulated under the Clean Air Act, it would set off one of the most extensive regulatory rule makings in history. Ms. Jackson knows that she would be stepping into a minefield of Congressional and industry opposition and said that she was trying to devise a program that allayed these worries.Launch of The Climate Sceptics - A New Political Party | CO2sceptics
“We are poised to be specific on what we regulate and on what schedule,” Ms. Jackson said. “We don’t want people to spin that into a doomsday scenario.”
...
Senator John Barrasso, Republican of Wyoming, warned Ms. Jackson during her January confirmation hearing that she should not undercut Congress’s authority by using the agency’s regulatory power to address global warming. Mr. Barrasso called the use of the Clean Air Act to regulate carbon “a disaster waiting to happen.”
Many environmental advocates, however, said the E.P.A.’s action was long overdue, but added that it was only as a stopgap until Congress passed comprehensive climate change legislation.
“It’s politically necessary, scientifically necessary and legally necessary,” said David Bookbinder, chief climate counsel at the Sierra Club, a plaintiff in the Supreme Court case.
Please consider going to our web site www.climatesceptics.com.au signing up as a member and passing this info on to others who you think may be interested in knowing of our existance.Australian Climate Madness: ETS parliamentary review "scrapped"
This is truly unbelievable conduct by this morally bankrupt Government. They don't even have the guts to subject their ETS to scrutiny for fear of it being exposed for the pointless political gesture that we all know it is.Chu lays out plans for energy forum
The forum, scheduled for Feb. 23 features Bill Clinton, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and, possibly, an appearance by Al Gore. Which means, of course, that it will snow.
1 comment:
So does this mean the EPA must rid the atmosphere of all CO2? Why not? Who determines how much is too much?
Post a Comment