The Ideology of Ecology and the Dictatorship of the Ecoliteriat

The Global Warming fraud is meant to demonize Western industry in general and greatly reduce the standard of living in Western nations with a series of restrictions on industry and basic daily life.

Prominent scientists who question the rush to a Global Warming consensus are smeared and accused of being cranks or secretly taking money from oil companies. Groups of “Concerned Scientists”, often operating outside their fields but inside a left wing political ideology, are thrown together demanding immediate government action to halt Global Warming. These are all hallmarks of the same process begin repeated.

Of course the inconvenient thing for Global Warming is that it is testable by simple observation (which outside of a nuclear war, Nuclear Winter was not) and when global warming activists find themselves freezing, faith in Al begins to collapse. So does any public consensus that there is a Global Warming crisis, no matter how many commercials about crying polar bears get run.

The irony of Global Warming is that it ignores the well known changes to global temperatures that are well documented over the centuries and even the millennia. In favor of assigning blame to human beings.

Writer defends his opinions and his right to have one

Paraphrased: "What scientific experience do former Czech president Vaclav Havel, Michael Crichton, etc. have?" Havel is a smart and savvy politician. In other words, he possesses the same qualifications to speak on global warming as Al Gore. Havel, as well as the other politicians I previously named, were mentioned because they have influence in changing public policy and because they are courageous to speak their minds on this subject. Michael Crichton, aside from being a successful novelist, received a degree in anthropology, a medical doctorate from Harvard, and a fellowship in biological studies. He has given public policy talks on environmental theory. The relevant credentials or job titles for the rest of the names were noted in my previous letter.
...
Finally, Cordes invites me to keep my opinions to myself, as is common among global warming cultists. I decline that request, as that is what letters to the editor and opinion pages are for.

STEPHEN A. POSCHMANN

Environmental damage hurts children and elderly most

AUSTIN, Texas (ABP) -- Environmental degradation presents the greatest danger to the most vulnerable people --particularly children and the elderly, a Houston pediatrician recently told the Texas Baptist Christian Life Commission’s annual conference.

Scientists have reached consensus about the reality of global warming, and children especially will bear the brunt of its effects, said Susan Pacheco, a faculty member of the pediatrics department at the University of Texas Medical School in Houston.