Big Hollywood » Blog Archive » What Would Walt [Disney] Say?

...Hour upon hour of glorious footage, filmed by brilliant and intrepid photographers are turned into an agitprop picture condemning consumerism and capitalism.

“Wall-E,” a brilliant animated picture, is another example of the Disney crowd using its powerful creativity to send a message to the younger set: we are destroying the earth. “We” meaning, of course, America with its incredibly successful production of “stuff”. And like all good propaganda, it has more than a kernel of truth to it. The waste in this country is overwhelming. I don’t object to reasonable preachment in favor of conservation and against waste. What pisses me off is the fact that the cultural left is frightening the children. And they’re doing it on purpose. Polls of little kids have been taken which show that they are scared as hell that the earth will be an uninhabitable place to live in when they grow up.

American Daily Review - articles blog - Save The Polar Bear: Hysteria and Myth

The More Science Learns, the More They Realize That Al Gore Is Simply A Snake Oil Salesman
...
Man-made Global Warming is not only a myth, but even science, or at least the few continuing to hang on to this fairy tale, realizes the holes in their argument. Yet, the leaders of the world continue to push for legislation to “save the planet,” and save the polar bears. The hard truth is that they are doing this not to save the planet. Global Warming is the excuse. The aim is further control over private industries. Man-made global warming is a farce, and they know it.

Perhaps that is why no author was listed regarding the piece in the New York Times about saving the polar bears. Even the man-made global warming sheep are too embarrassed to leave their name on anything supporting the illogical myth.

May 2009 Sunspot Update – Fun Facts / Cool Outlook « Digital Diatribes

The exact number isn’t as important as the conclusion: The last point in which the 12-month average sunspot count was at least 100 was January 2003. The temperature then, isn’t really influenced much one way or another until the count gets below 60. That point occurred March 2004. If temperature lags by about 18 months, and the chart shows about 0.1 degrees change per year influence, then we would see the initial indications of actual cooling starting in 2006. 0.1 degrees Celsius over a couple years is not enough, with the variability of global temps, to draw any firm conclusions. And this decrease may well be offset by some other factors. But if the next solar cycle has a very low maximum, then we’re looking at a 15-20 year period of temperatures declining at 0.1 degrees Celsius per year. That will be noticed.