Wednesday, April 14, 2010

'Hockey stick' graph was exaggerated - Telegraph
The 'hockey stick' that became emblematic of the threat posed by climate change exaggerated the rise in temperature because it was created using 'inappropriate' methods, according to the head of the Royal Statistical Society.
The Catlin Arctic Survey 2010
Life seems to be getting easier out here; it certainly feels warmer, although it is still minus 20 degrees Celsius most days.
'Climategate scientists should be immediately beatified in preparation for full sainthood by 2011′ says latest official enquiry – Telegraph Blogs

Go on then. Have a guess what the latest official Climategate enquiry - headed by the rigorous, utterly unbiased, totally impartial, and fanatically unpartisan Lord Oxburgh – has decided.

Yes, that’s right. They’re all totally innocent!

Climate Common Sense: Oxburgh Inquiry - No Scientific Malpractice- I See Nothing!!!
Oxburgh and Sergeant Schultz of Hogan's Heroes have a lot in common including selective myopia when examining evidence contrary to the Global Warming doctrine.
Bolivia Blog one: Getting ready, the People’s Conference on Climate Change and Mother Earth Rights in Bolivia | World Development Movement
WDM first revealed the bullying and bribery tactics of rich countries in Copenhagen.

Bolivia, one of these most affected countries, has even been threatened that it will only receive climate finance if it puts its name to the Accord. The bullying from countries like the US was so outrageous that even Yvo de Boer, the UN’s outgoing climate chief spoke out about the threat to withdraw £2.5 million from Bolivia: “Bolivia is loosing £2.5 million in climate funds. That is what the presidential palace pays for toilet paper in a year. Bullying is not an effective instrument” – in one breath referring both to the inadequacy of the sums being offered by rich countries like the US as well as the outrageous nature of these bribes.
Red flag for a sinking Obama: Americans now prefer Hillary Clinton | Top of the Ticket | Los Angeles Times
61% now think favorably of the former senator and only 35% unfavorably, both numbers improved from the 56% and 40% she had during the Democratic National Convention in late August of 2008.
...
By comparison, in the same CNN poll, 57% of Americans now think favorably of Obama, down from 78% just before his inauguration; and 41% now think unfavorably of him, more than twice his unfavorable rating of early 2009.

No comments: