Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Tuvalu v. ExxonMobil? | Mother Jones
While the scientific evidence of climate change [what evidence, specifically?] has hardened to the point of irrefutability, blaming someone for it in a court of law is a knottier business.
Newsletter: NZCLIMATE TRUTH NO 244 by Vincent Gray | Climate Realists
All of the computer models of the climate have adopted the flat earth theory of the earth's energy...

It assumes that the earth can be considered to be flat, that the sun shines all day and all night with equal intensity, and that the temperature of the earth's surface is constant.
Cameron's favourite greenie Zac Goldsmith is toast – Telegraph Blogs
What we could do without is well-meaning rich kids plotting to wipe out the economy because of a problem that only exists in their pretty, spoilt, guilt-tripping heads.
Sunspots, We Don’t Need No Stinking Sunspots « Musings from the Chiefio


I came upon this image in a rather interesting, if slightly slanted toward the politically correct view of AGW, article at:

http://www.oar.noaa.gov/spotlite/archive/spot_sunclimate.html with the provocative subtitle: “Did Sunspots Sink The Titanic”?

No comments: