The death knell for global warming alarmism | ScottishSceptic

Two reports have or are coming up with I believe is the nail in the coffin of global warming. There will always be idiots who believe this nonsense, but the evidence against the ridiculous “it’s got to be CO2 as nothing else explains warming” and “there are massive positive feedbacks, there’s got to be because CO2 did it”. They are now dead.

CERN is about to come out with a report which from the gossip will say that solar activity does cause cloud formation from which it is pretty obvious that “it was the sun what did it”.

Now Roy Spencer has direct observational evidence that the atmosphere is not retaining the heat it needs to retain if the necessary massive positive feedbacks were in place...

Individually they are damning, together they are conclusive and anyone who doesn’t listen is an scientific moron (which won’t stop many as morons seem to float to the top of science).

Heat Index In Antarctica | Real Science

Feels like -88

Nature on Heartland | Climate Etc.

In the context of science, skeptics should be regarded as legitimate or even vital partners in the search for scientific truth, exercising their right to remain unconvinced and require more information, point out perceived contradictions and flawed reasoning, and emphasize alternative hypotheses.

Unlike the group of scientists that comprise and support the IPCC consensus, the skeptics are very diverse collection of individuals that for the most part are unorganized, with the blogosphere supporting substantial diversity.

Turnbull was against it before he was for it | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog

Tom Switzer’s Spectator confronts Malcolm Turnbull with his own wisdom, alas, long gone:

‘We cannot, by our own mitigating actions, stop [climate change], because we’re too small. But what we must do, and this is what we must really focus on, is adapt to it.’