Wow: Left-wing climate hoax promoter Andy Revkin suggests that Republicans are "anti-scientific" and not "reality-based"

A Fundamental Republican Science Problem - NYTimes.com

...a more fundamental explanation is hinted at in polling on broader attitudes on science. The bottom line continues to be that belief, particularly religious belief, trumps data.   [So what "data" does Revkin have that should convince me that CO2 is driving dangerous climate change?]
...
Given how the nomination process and primaries work, is there any chance that a reality-based Republican can be a serious candidate in the general election? It doesn’t seem possible, at least for now. It’s to the credit of Jon Huntsman and Mitt Romney that they have tried. Maybe the tide will turn a bit, if Republicans are punished by voters who recognize the perils of anti-scientific policies.