Friday, October 21, 2011

Embattled warmist Peter Gleick tries to defend his trashing of a book that he obviously didn't read

Twitter / @PeterGleick
@RichardTol No. I won't deal with Watts, who censors comments, and then demands others take time to point out and fix the errors of others.
Twitter / @clim8resistance: @PeterGleick It wasn't a r ...
@PeterGleick It wasn't a review; you didn't read the book. It's your inability to debate that causes criticism. Same w/ IPCC @NOconsensus
Twitter / @PeterGleick
@clim8resistance I love a good debate, only on real issues not made up crap like laframbois diatribe and climate chg denial. :)

No comments: