Email 297, August 2004, Phil Jones and Michael Mann: This peer review process looks completely corrupt, with warmist Jones rejecting a paper by realists McKitrick and Michaels, and Mann somehow in the loop, wanting to use this "to help bolster the case against MM??"

Email 297

At 08:11 13/08/2004 -0400, you wrote:

Thanks a bunch Phil, Along lines as my other email, would it be (?) for me to forward this to the chair of our commitee confidentially, and for his internal purposes only, to help bolster the case against MM?? let me know... thanks, mike

At 03:43 AM 8/13/2004, Phil Jones wrote:

Mike, The paper ! Now to find my review. I did suggest to Andrew to find 3 reviewers. Phil