Monday, May 21, 2012

Nixon Vindicates Himself : “I Am Not A Crook” | Real Science

Suzanne Goldenberg writes that one of Gleick’s unnamed buddies says that he didn’t commit forgery, and that his fraud and theft was all good – because it helped stifle debate.

...Suzanne then goes on to brag about how little money skeptics have. In her next article she will forget about this, and discuss the big money denier machine.

There was a time when liberals demanded debate and free speech. The end never justified the means. Now people like Suzanne have become the epitome of what they claim to despise – thanks to their mindless primitive fear of CO2, and fear of anyone who doesn’t share their neuroses.

Climate Science Education Graduates to the Next Level | Climate Central

Climate change, in effect, has become the poster child for what the National Academy of Sciences hopes to accomplish with science education. 

"If we can get the standards ... climate-rich, then that's going to have a domino effect in getting into state standards, and getting into textbooks and curricula," said Karsten at the National Science Foundation.

"That could be pretty catalytic."

EU: “Science Demands” Co2 Emissions Reduction of 95%! | hauntingthelibrary

If you thought the current talk of enforced compliance with energy reduction mandates and soaring electricity prices was oppressive, you ain’t seen nothing yet. Especially if you live within the European Union. According to the bureaucrats in charge of EU Climate Change Policy “science tells us” that we have to reduce emissions of Co2 not by 20, 40, or even 60% but by a ludicrous 80-95%. Or else:

Lamb’s science to the slaughter | Digging in the Clay

the IPCC has frozen climate science progress since its inception. Lamb knew what was going to happen as he recorded in his autobiography (1997). He created the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) because

“…it was clear that the first and greatest need was to establish the facts of the past record of the natural climate in times before any side effects of human activities could well be important.”

No comments: