Claim: Today’s climate is more sensitive than that of the past | Watts Up With That?

Pachauri’s TERI helping to produce “green” cigarettes | JunkScience.com

Now what was that comparison between AGW skeptics  and the tobacco industry?

Australian Climate Tsar Calls for Ripping Fillings from the Dead: “You Just Need a Pair of Pliers” | hauntingthelibrary

Barcoded at birth, teeth ripped out with a pair of pliers when you die. Not much a  life is it? Still, at least human pollution will be being dealt with in as efficient, cost-effective manner as possible.

The New Nostradamus of the North: UNEP is scaremongering on the eve of the megalomaniac Rio+20 conference

The megalomaniac UN Rio+20 conference is soon to open its doors in Rio de Janeiro. True to its traditions, UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) is trying to hype the event with a new version of the armageddon awaiting us if the "world leaders and nations meeting at Rio+20" do not agree on "a decisive and defining transition towards a low-carbon, resource-efficient, job-generating Green economy".

The usual UN scaremongering is included in the fifth edition of the Global Environment Outlook (GEO-5), "launched on the even of the Rio+20 Summit":

So it’s come to this, climate science so corrupt its consideration has to be legislated out | JunkScience.com

Is there a greater indictment of a field of scientific endeavor than to be so far from the facts and reality that legislation must be introduced to preclude its use by scam artists and misanthropic greens? Of course the LA Ties’ Patt Morrison views it somewhat differently:

Opposing Views: Warming nears point of no return, scientists say by David Perlman: Updated by Richard Lindzen | Climate Realists

Richard Lindzen, a climate scientist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology who has been a vociferous skeptic on the urgency of global warming, called the warnings by Barnosky and his colleagues "highly implausible."

"Even if their models of the future were correct, what's crucial is the time frame, and no one thinks that something terrible will happen in anything like the future they see," Lindzen said. "Their population predictions are extremely unlikely, and their climate predictions are always hypothetical."