Climate Conversation Group » The inexplicable lunacy of the learned

the real curiosity is what happened to far-off academia, in disciplines and departments which have nothing to do with climatology. As far as they can be from normal life, as far as possible, one would imagine, from the implications of global warming — how could they be infected?

Climate Conversation Group » Herald shows what to avoid in climate debate

If anyone could be labeled climate change deniers, it is activists who hold the absurd view that our climate was tranquil until industrialization, at which point it started to change rapidly. They seem not to know that there have been periods as recently as 10,000 years ago when temperatures both rose and fell almost 100 times faster than what occurred in the 20th century. Climate changes, at times dramatically so, all by itself. That what climates do on planet with significant atmospheres.

The Warmist fear of debate goes back a long way

The Warmist response to skeptics is of course not even a simulacrum of science -- but nor is Warmism itself. They huff and they puff and they blow their own house down.

Back Soon « NoFrakkingConsensus

I’ve long been puzzled by why we’re so quick to believe the climate change doom-and-gloom narrative. Why don’t we demand an explanation of how this apparent crisis is qualitatively different from all those others? You’d think that would be the first question we – and the media – would ask.

In the 21st century, with all our education and all our technology, are we really just children who get a perverse thrill from telling ourselves scary stories around campfires? Are we really so emotionally and spiritually immature that we need to invent one crisis after another in order to imbue our lives with meaning and purpose?