Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Mitt Romney raises EU concerns for climate [scam] talks | Environment | guardian.co.uk
An EU official told EurActiv that he expected climate talks would "become much harder again" under a Romney administration, while EU-US relations on climate issues would become "quite challenging".

"It would make [climate negotiations] more of an uphill struggle than they are now," another EU source said.

"The first thing [Romney] would do would be to fire [US climate chief negotiator] Todd Stern and find someone with his own climate change agenda because Todd Stern has some knowledge about this issue," the source speculated.
...
Thomas Legge, a senior climate and energy officer at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, said that the radicalism of Romney's party - as well as his climate change statements and campaign funding - would make it difficult for him to govern from the centre.
..."I don't think either candidate wants to make a big deal out of climate change because they don't see it as vote-winning issue," he added.
Remember the panic over methane seeping out of the Arctic seabed in 2009? Never mind. | Watts Up With That?
Gas Outlets off Spitsbergen Are No New Phenomenon
Three ways to change the climate, in 2012 and beyond | Grist
Over the last two years, the consequences of 150 years of fossil-fuel development have materialized with a vengeance...After the electoral smoke clears, no matter who is president, another side of the climate movement must swing into action: disciplined, large-scale opposition to new coal, oil, and gas development, including nonviolent direct action.
Die Klimazwiebel: The end of tribalism?
Maybe post-Climategate, tribalism in the climate debate has lost some of its power, and skepticism is re-gaining its meaning as a scientific virtue. If so, both Mojib Latif and Judith Curry contributed to this development; one in being courageous enough to make such a non-alarmist statement (as a member of the "UN tribe"!); and the other for analyzing tribalism and giving credibility to skepticism. Maybe it's too early to state that the climate wars are over; but there are indeed signs that climate science is on its way back to the status of "organized skepticism".

No comments: