Thursday, October 11, 2012

Lubos Motl: "A group of hardcore alarmists whom we know from the Climategate is irritated because they apparently couldn't keep a complete control over the IPCC"

The Reference Frame: Kevin Trenberth: too bureaucratic IPCC sucks
Well, within a smaller group of activists and corrupt scientists who really created the shameful body, it was easy to reach a consensus with Greenpeace, WWF, and other whackos and scum (that constituted most of those "2,500 experts") and claim that their crackpot claims about the climate represent the "consensus".

But when a more representative sample of climate scientists apparently got the green card to join the process – after some scandals that forced the formerly hardcore Stalinist organization to open a little bit – it's suddenly hard to prove that 97 percent of the climate scientists back the crackpot IPCC claims, isn't it, Mr Trenberth? A group of hardcore alarmists whom we know from the Climategate is irritated because they apparently couldn't keep a complete control over the IPCC. Why don't you use the right words?

No comments: