Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Uh oh: Warmist John Cook claimed that papers by skeptics Craig D. Idso, Nicola Scafetta, and Nir J. Shaviv endorsed CO2-induced global warming?

Popular Technology.net: 97% Study Falsely Classifies Scientists' Papers, "It would be incorrect to claim that our paper was an endorsement of CO2-induced global warming"
Their responses are eye opening and evidence that the Cook et al. (2013) team falsely classified scientists' papers as "endorsing AGW", apparently believing to know more about the papers than their authors.


Anonymous said...

Skeptical Science constantly mistates the mythical consensus, from his web site:

"Several independent studies have shown that 97% of climate scientists agree that humans are causing the climate to change, that CO2 is causing global changes to the climate, and that the consequences could be catastrophic. These views form the scientific consensus on climate change."

It's easy to verify that none of the 97% consesnsus surveys say anything about catastrophic consequences.

He leave this disinformation on his site, even though it has been pointed out many times.

Amado said...

This is cool!