Thursday, December 10, 2009

Senators Offer New Climate [Swindle] Proposals - Green Inc. Blog - NYTimes.com
The proposal was timed to help persuade delegates to the United Nations climate change conference in Copenhagen that the Senate is serious about passing a climate bill and not mired in a partisan morass.
We're Not Just About Minnesota Anymore - Minnesotans For Global Warming

CBS played a clip of Hide the Decline. It was also played on CNN (can't find the clip). Stephanie Gutmann wrote another nice article on our newest video "It's A Climate gate Christmas" on the London Telegraph's website. Here's one a little closer to home.

Met Office: Climate could warm to record levels in 2010 | Climate Realists
The claims by the Met Office seem to becoming more and more alarmist rather then informative. This time they have stated the word "COULD" in a 12 month forecast, if they are wrong AGAIN about their long range forecasts then it's OK as they only stated "COULD" and not "WOULD". This rather silly process of noncommittal forecasting could go on indefinitely, and if they tried the same forecast for the next 10 years stating it "COULD" warm to record levels, then it may well be found in ONE location of the Earth. But that does not matter, they would have achieved a correct forecast and therefore proved the world is still warming.
The Climate Change Propaganda Machine: Paul Murdock
In the last several weeks we have learned several new facts about climate change research. First, climate scientists’ motives are biased. Second, scientists actively discussed how to achieve political ends through their research. Third, and more disturbingly, the public has learned of discarded data, attempts to keep opposing views silent, and total political adherence to an ideology.

Yet, without thinking twice, the main stream media and President Obama have shrugged off the controversy and continued boldly with their partisan agenda. It is clear the science behind climate change is biased and disputed, leaving the propaganda machine as the only fact that remains.
After climate talks, scientists worry about enforcement - USATODAY.com
Weiss, a geochemist who studies atmospheric pollution at San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography, says the numbers at the core of the debate in Copenhagen are flawed.

Specifically, he says the cuts that countries including the USA are proposing in greenhouse gas emissions are difficult to measure and highly susceptible to manipulation by government officials and companies.

No comments: