Da: p.jones@uea.ac.uk Data: 21.12.2007 13.25 A: Oggetto: Re: AW: Re: PS AW: Fwd: Re: more questions
Jacopo, I'm not going to comment on your text, because your report is awful. I thought you wanted a balanced report. What you've written isn't. You've not understood any of what was said on the Real Climate Audit web site.
You have several words wrong and what you say doesn't make sense at times. But you don't seem to want to discuss proper climate science.
Phil
Tuesday
4 hours ago
Posts
1 comment:
Enough already. I've read through quite a few of these now. anytime Phil Jones doesn't agree with a position he calls it "garbage," "crap," and "awful." He seldom gives an example and then has comments where he says he doesn't care if his station locations aren't reported correctly or at all. ...this man doesn't deserve his position. He is rude, has circular reasoning, is condescending, ..I'm sorry, I just don't understand how he maintained a position like this with his casual attitude toward scientific method and his disdain for other experts who have different interpretations of facts (or different facts!).
Post a Comment