Monckton on Andrew Dessler’s Post | The SPPI Blog

The water vapor feedback, if it had been anything like as big as the UN and Dr. Dessler would have us believe, should have caused a massive increase in global temperature. It didn’t. – Christopher

Overcoming Climate Inertia by Joseph A. Olson, PE | Climate Realists

You could always visit the Met and RMS websites and warm yourself with the threats of the “barbecue” summer of 2009 that they promised and you never got. Or warm yourself with the Met warnings that this will be the warmest winter on record as soon as it stops being cold.

Which brings us back to good Sir Newton, and the ‘unless acted on by another force’ part of his Law. The RSMs could gather the courage to force the RS, the RMS and the Met into admitting that there is not now and never has been any human cause for climate change. If the Royal Society Members cannot or will not act to restore the principles of the English Scientific Method then you may have an additional source of warmth. Track down a RSM, seize his membership certificate and burn that. By their inaction they have proven their society membership certificate is as worthless as old books.

Joseph A Olson, PE

A New Propaganda Film by Natl. Resources Defense Council Fails the Acid Test of Real World Data by SPPI | Climate Realists

First, they called it “global warming”. Then they noticed there had been no warming for 15 years, and cooling for 9, so they hastily renamed it “climate change”. Then they noticed the climate was changing no more than it ever had, so they tried “energy security”, and even named a Congressional Bill after it. Then they noticed that most Western nations already had bountiful energy security, in the form of vast, untapped domestic supplies of oil, gas, coal, or all three, so they switched to “ocean acidification”.

Steve Janke: Statistical proof that Facebook groups cause global warming - Full Comment

I've created a very complex computer model using similar programs that are used to model the climate. That way, if I don't like what the model tells me, I can go ahead and make up new results, and just tell you what I want you to hear, the same way climatologists ignore their models when it suits them to spin whatever story they care to tell.

Here is what my model is telling me (or not, but then, I know I'm right, regardless of the data, the way climatologists are right, regardless of the data)

Report: Most money managers ignore climate risk to profit | Energy | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle

In a survey of asset managers, almost three quarters said they don't take into account global warming when analyzing a company, CERES, whose investors have $8.5 trillion under management, said today in a report.

Long Drought Ahead From Global Warming, [Bogus] Study Says | Amy Linn

Here are highlights of the research, straight from the UM statement:

-- By about the 2080s, hotter temperatures could cause about two months of additional drought.
...
-- Over this century, the region could see an annual average warming trend of 3.6 to 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit, with winter temperatures expected to increase more than temps in other seasons.

The study was funded by the National Commission on Energy Policy, a bipartisan nonprofit organization.

Snow could cost economy £1bn | The Sun |News

BRITAIN'S big freeze will blow a 1 BILLION hole in the economy — and could push long-suffering small firms to the wall.

Avatar, not Ed, will make the case on climate | Alice Thomson - Times Online

Avatar — rather than Ed Miliband talking about Copenhagen — could do the same for global warming. If you can get through the snow to see it.

How Britain's frozen day unfolded - contains video

A driver named Clive called the local BBC radio station from the blocked section of motorway to say: “There must be hundreds and hundreds of cars stuck. People have been just turning their engines off and falling asleep. I just pulled a couple of jackets over me and tried to sleep."