Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Academic attempts to take the hot air out of climate science debate | Leo Hickman | Environment | guardian.co.uk
Judith Curry aims to turn inflammatory debate of 'climategate' into reasoned online discussions to rebuild trust with the public
On the Credibility of Climate Research, Part II: Towards Rebuilding Trust: Judith Curry
No one really believes that the “science is settled” or that “the debate is over.” Scientists and others that say this seem to want to advance a particular agenda. There is nothing more detrimental to public trust than such statements.
Yesterday: EPA Chief Goes Toe-To-Toe With Senate GOP Over Climate Science - NYTimes.com
"The science behind climate change is settled, and human activity is responsible for global warming," Jackson told the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. "That conclusion is not a partisan one."
They call this a consensus?
"Only an insignificant fraction of scientists deny the global warming crisis. The time for debate is over. The science is settled."

So said Al Gore ... in 19[-freaking-]92. Amazingly, he made his claims despite much evidence of their falsity.
Congressional Performance - Rasmussen Reports™
Only 10% of voters say Congress is doing a good or excellent job.
- Bishop Hill blog - Cartoons by Josh
Resident cartoonist, Josh, has started a dedicated website for his climate related work. See it here.

No comments: