p.18, lines 19-20: I don't like the use of 'truth' and 'precise' here. It
implies a strong natural science view prediction and the competence of
science (modellers!) which I think should be softened.
I don't think that the science we are
> talking about is sufficiently known yet to claim the "truth",
> which is why we are having some of our disagreements.
the Australian data is in pretty good order anyway.
Truth be know, climate change here is now running so rampant that we don't need
meteorological data to see it