Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Email 88: Mike Hulme

p.18, lines 19-20: I don't like the use of 'truth' and 'precise' here. It
implies a strong natural science view prediction and the competence of
science (modellers!) which I think should be softened.

Email 209: Ed Cook

I don't think that the science we are
> talking about is sufficiently known yet to claim the "truth",
> which is why we are having some of our disagreements.

Email 601: David Jones

the Australian data is in pretty good order anyway.
Truth be know, climate change here is now running so rampant that we don't need
meteorological data to see it

No comments: