Wednesday, November 23, 2011

From the Climategate 2.0 files: CRU scientist admits ‘…”our” reaction on the errors found in Mike Mann’s work were not especially honest.’ | GORE LIED

Climategate 2.0: Bias in Scientific Research « Roy Spencer, Ph. D.

But when only one hypothesis is allowed as the explanation for climate change (e.g. “the science is settled”), the bias becomes so thick and acrid that everyone can smell the stench. Everyone except the IPCC leadership, that is.

Rahmstorf In Panic Over Mangini’s Stalagmites

What should I answer?

Climategate 2.0: the most damning email of them all – Telegraph Blogs

"What was the most damning email in the entire Climategate saga?" future historians will no doubt ask. "Was it the Hide the Decline one? Was it maybe the one where Michael Mann tries to recruit private detectives to spy on Steve McIntyre for the crime of debunking his Hockey Stick? Was it the one where Kevin Trenberth describes it as a "travesty" that he and his climate conspirators can't account for the lack of warming?"

Nope. None of the above.

No comments: