Michael Mann: "The appropriate outlets would be: EDF, other NGO groups, Ross Gelbspan's site, David Appell's blog, etc..."

From email 5297:

On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 15:45 +0100, David Thompson wrote:
     > Phil et al...
     >
     >   ....
     >  I've agreed to chat with any Nature reporters on the story. But
     > otherwise I'm going to be pretty cautious about what reporters I chat
     > with... I'll let all of you know if there are any other reasonable
     > interview requests from folks we trust (eg Andy Revkin, etc).
     >
     >
     > -Dave

From email 5279:

date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:47:04 -0400
from: Andy anrevk@xxx
subject: Re: couple things..
to: Tim Osborn t.osborn@xxx

...a key question, to me, is whether tihs new analysis implies that there has
been wishful (or at lest selective) thinking in the paleo analyses done so
far (mann and others)? In other words, is there any evidence in all of this
that their bias against past variability is intentional?

we're all always looking for what we want to find, to some extent, no?

From email 4807, circa 2003:

  As per your suggestions, I'll await receipt of your CLIMLIST/SCEPTICSLIST email to send
   this together to other outlets for joint posting. Will you guys will send out to all of the
   other scientists, etc. who' Timmerata, etc. emailed too?
   The appropriate outlets would be: EDF, other NGO groups, Ross Gelbspan's site, David
   Appell's blog, etc...
   So I'll await further word from you,
   thanks again,
   mike (mann)