Revkin Jumps To Conclusions Without Doing Any Research | Real Science

How did he come to the conclusion that greenhouse-driven  warming is responsible?

Perhaps if Andy had spent five minutes doing research, he would have known that the Arctic has been warming for almost 200 years.

How To Tell A Scientist From A Crook | Real Science

A scientist would look at the horrific weather of the 1930s, and try to figure out why it happened.

A crook would simply alter the data – to make the 1930s disappear.

Climate change alarmist recants: ‘I made mistake’ - Wheelers Wisdom - The Daily Advertiser

However, the Lake George wind farm, with Tim up a wind tower preaching how wind power will save the world, while not a wind generator in the background was turning, was the best part.

And near the end of the series, there was Tim Flannery talking about Gaia, unaware that Gaia’s inventor had denounced the whole idea, calling it “alarmist”, and bagging Tim Flannery (as well as Al Gore) in the process.

Quadrant Online - cartoon - The arrogance of youth

PIK Potsdam Institute Drifts, Forms Alliances With Religious Organizations – Target: Redistribution, Global Justice

When scientists drift away from research and involve themselves with religious groups in order to focus on the mission of reshaping society, then you’ve got to wonder. Was that the original idea of our tax money?