1. Fitzpatrick et al's original June '05 Science paper here.
2. Sibley et al's March '06 comment here, with Supporting Online Material here.
3. Fitzpatrick et al's response to Sibley et al's comment here.
4. Another Sibley/Fitz round (March '07) from Science is linked here.
5. Jerome Jackson's Auk letter (January '06) here.
6. A Fitz et al response to Jackson (April '06 Auk) is here.
7. More from Jackson (Oct '06 Auk) is here.
8. Jones et al paper "Similarities Between Campephilus Woodpecker Double Raps and Mechanical Sounds Produced by Duck Flocks" here.
9. Martin Collinson's paper (March '07) here.
10. Cornell's online Luneau video analysis (Feb '06) here.
11. Louis Bevier's Ivory-billed debate site here.
“Gender-responsive climate action”
1 hour ago
Posts
2 comments:
Thanks a million, Tom! I'm sure this will be a valuable resource for all the readers of this blog who will be making their voice heard at the USFWS. If enough people present well-founded arguments against spending more than $5 million per year to recover a species not known to exist, maybe it will have some positive effect on the process.
Don't forget Peckergate: The Ivory-billed Woodpecker Hoax:
http://www.worldtwitch.com/ivorybill.htm
Post a Comment