If the NIPCC report is flawed, then its critics should try to lay out their objections without emotive references to “denial” or libelous claims of “venality” on the part of skeptics--or to claims that the work was produced by Exxon-Mobil. The Post welcomes all comments on the report, preferably from those who have read it.
Tuesday, March 04, 2008
Analyze this, ye warming believers: Peter Foster
From this page:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment