Rudd means to hurt | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog
The pain is the point - to make the cheapest, but gassier, power too expensive to keep using. And if the Government promises no pain, then why have Rudd’s scheme at all?
But still journalists won’t ask even more fundamental questions, such as:
1. If the world has stopped warming, why have Rudd’s scheme at all?
2. If world emissions will keep soaring whatever we do, why have Rudd’s scheme at all?
3. If the biggest emitters - and our competitors - have no intention of cutting their own gases, why have Rudd’s scheme at all?
4. If the price of coping with any warming is much less than the price of trying to stop it, why have Rudd’s scheme at all?
No comments:
Post a Comment