Just for fun, take a look at these typos
* Thanks to the cooperative relationship between NASA and JAXA, we are applying the AMSR-E sea ice concentration algorism developed by Dr. Comiso in NASA/GSFC.By the way, I've been occasionally downloading sea ice extent data from that page (here, CSV file). Earlier today, the provided number for 8/10/08 was 6335938 square kilometers; later today, I noticed that the provided 8/10/08 number had increased by nearly 8,000 square kilometers to 6343906 square kilometers. I wonder what happened?
...
* The numbers of sea ice extent in this site are estimates calculated by certain algorism.
I put up the two versions of the .csv file on my screen and took the following screen shot--the discrepancy is on line 2263 (click to enlarge):
Sometimes I wonder how reliable this sea ice extent data is. Note the big drop between Aug 5th and 6th, with the last three digits not changing; then note that the number barely changed at all between the 7th and the 8th.
This report also makes me wonder:
In January my jet flew 400 nm south of Greenland on a clear, sunny morning. There was solid sea-ice in all directions, as far as the eye could see, and visibility was excellent. When we landed, I downloaded the official sea-ice map from the satellite for that day. No sea-ice was shown on that map anywhere south of Greenland.
2 comments:
Tom,
Long time and enthusiastic reader: thank you.
I highly recommend this post.
DK
I'd have to say that less than 1/2 a percent revision to data is acceptable when calculating a value such as sea ice extent.
Post a Comment