Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Article admits the obvious: Primates prefer warmer climates

Fossil Reveals Ancient Primates Took Refuge in Texas
AUSTIN, Texas, October 20, 2008 (ENS) - More than 43 million years ago, when tropical forests and active volcanoes covered west Texas, primates chose to live there in preference to cooler northern climates, according to new fossil evidence discovered by Chris Kirk, physical anthropologist at the University of Texas at Austin.

Directing a field project to recover Eocene fossils from West Texas, Kirk and colleague Blythe Williams of Duke University discovered Diablomomys dalquesti, a new genus and species of primate that dates back at least 43 million years.

"After several years of collecting new fossils, reviewing Texas' primate community and comparing it to other places in North America, we found a much more diverse group of primate species in Texas than we expected," Kirk said.

During the early part of the Eocene epoch, primates were common in the tropical forests that covered most of North America, scientists say.

Marking the start of the Eocene, about 55 million years ago, Earth heated up in one of the most rapid and extreme global warming events recorded in geologic history - a time marked by the emergence of the first modern mammals.

Over time, climate cooling caused North American primates to decline in abundance and diversity. By the end of the Eocene, about 33 million years ago, primates and most tropical species had almost disappeared from North America.

Kirk's discovery of late middle Eocene primates at the Devil's Graveyard Formation in southwest Texas reveals new information about how North American primates evolved during this period of animal reorganization.

"It seems that primates stuck around in Texas much longer than many other parts of the continent because the climate stayed warm for a longer period of time," he said.

While primates were disappearing in places like Utah and Wyoming during the late middle Eocene, "west Texas provided a humid, tropical refuge for primates and other arboreal animals," Kirk explained.
1. So what caused this "rapid and extreme" global warming event?

2. Why should we fear a slightly warmer world, when this previous global warming event was evidently *good* for North American primates, rain forests, arboreal species, etc?

3. When this previous warming occurred, why didn't the alleged positive feedbacks kick in, causing runaway global warming that extinguished all life on Earth?

No comments: