The Press Association: Warning over heat from energy use
Two British scientists from Newcastle University calculated that an increase in global energy use of 1% a year would mean that by 2100 the heat given off would be enough to cancel out the benefits of cuts in emissions.Keep this in mind the next time you consider elective surgery
Nick Cowern and Chihak Ahn of the School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering looked at a scenario which says cutting greenhouse gasses over the next 40 years by phasing out coal would mean the greenhouse effect will start to fall by 2050, stabilising the climate.
But they said although heat generated by energy consumption is relatively low, in 100 years time it could be enough to cancel out emissions cuts.
They said in light of this possibility it was better to use solar power than nuclear power, which releases energy into the environment which would otherwise be locked up.
[Video] Medical experts at the UK’s Royal College of Physicians have warned that climate change could be a bigger threat to global health than smoking, alcohol or obesity.China, India lead demand extra help for climate stuggle-Developmental Issues-Earth-The Times of India
BEIJING: China and India next week will spearhead calls for rich nations to dig into their pockets to tackle climate change but will resist targeted curbs on their own carbon emissions, sources say.Vatican unveils ambitious solar energy plans | Environment | Reuters
The 1.2 million euro ($1.6 million) system, devised and donated by German companies SolarWorld and SMA Solar Technology, will allow the 108-acre city-state to cut its carbon dioxide emissions by about 225 tons and save the equivalent of 80 tons of oil each year.This just in: Some guy in the Maldives blames global warming for difficulty in catching baitfish
"Because of global warming it's difficult to get bait. This affects our life," Usuf told AFP. "Just today, one boat turned back because they didn't catch any bait."Bush Belittles Global Warming As A Threat To Animals | Science Blog
The Bush administration is finalizing changes to the Endangered Species Act (ESA) that could make sure that federal agencies wouldn't have to take global warming into consideration when evaluating risks to plants and animals. The new rule would block federal officials from having to consider a carbon cap.
No comments:
Post a Comment