My favorite part is when he links to a Wikipedia page in an attempt to convince us that there are only a "few dozen" skeptics.
“I did not have sex with that red herring” « Greenfyre’s
“I did not have sex with that red herring” « Greenfyre’s
The scientific consensus is real, there are only a few dozen so-called “skeptics”, most of whom have never done any actual work on climate, many of whom work for industry funded front groups and who push ideas that have been exposed as nonsense.About « Greenfyre’s
My name is Mike Kaulbars and most of my net activity is under my own name or as ‘greenfyre’, so a search engine will tell you far more than you ever wanted to know.
I trained as research biologist and now I direct a small NGO active on environmental and social justice issues.
Posts
4 comments:
"My favorite part is when ..."
When I make that sort of statement I include facts/evidence that show the claim to questionable if not actually false ... why haven't you?
Since it IS Wikipedia, why aren't you/others posting all of the names and credentials of these alleged other skeptic scientists?
When you have half as many credible posts validating climate alarmism as Tom has debunking them, you might earn some credibility.
And Wikipedia isn't a credible source.
Here you go Greenfyre. 650 scientists skeptical of AGW.
Here you go Klockarman, the fact that once again Inhofe's lists and "science" are pure crap:
http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/2008/12/18/ice-and-inhofes-list-both-melting-fast/
http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/denier-vs-skeptic/denier-myths-debunked/not-sparta-inhofe-and-the-400/
Skeptics? you are so gullible it's mind boggling
Post a Comment