WND, Joseph Farah: Hot enough for you?

Only England is still gung-ho – and, of course, the U.S. under Obama.

Can you believe so many people have been hoodwinked and conned by this pseudo-scientific power grab?

Watch out, because the EPA carbon Nazis may soon be knocking on your door to examine just how big your carbon footprint is.

Green Photo-Op of the Day - Greg Pollowitz - Planet Gore on National Review Online

To solve the infrastructure problem, however, I wonder: Why not transport large quantities of hydrogen in dirigibles, like they did in the good old days? Oh, the humanity of a hydrogen-powered economy.

Errors in IPCC climate science » Blog Archive » Tim Curtin shafts the Garnaut Report

The Garnaut Report’s stringent emission reduction targets stand or fall on the validity of the climate science of the IPCC. Apart from the Arrhenius hypothesis that rising carbon dioxide levels can have a warming effect, the rest of the IPCC’s climate projections derive from models heavily dependent on the unfounded assumptions that biospheric absorption will decline with the higher temperatures arising from elevated carbon dioxide, thereby further raising carbon dioxide and temperature in second-round effects, and that all other feedback effects will also be positive for warming.