Nationwide network of amateur weather stations takes on Met Office | CO2sceptics
This may be an interesting development...is the data from the Met Office suspect enough to reject and go one step further? Those of you who have seen the recent posting concerning the Temperature figure for January indicating how WARM it was (the seventh warmest!) may want to do the same as this group. Several people have questioned the readings for that period and it would not suprise many of us if the data has been corrupted in some way! More on that story later.Heliogenic Climate Change: Congress and the EPA
The EPA endangerment finding will cite the IPCC as it's scientific "proof", even though the IPCC is a UN political body founded for the express purpose of "proving" that CO2 is responsible for "global warming" and the "proof" consists solely of GIGO climate model output. The models are useless since their only variable is CO2, they treat the Sun and cloud albedo essentially as near-constant non-factors, and they contain strong positive feedbacks while in nature strong negative feedbacks dominate (see prior post). It's the biggest hoax in the history of science, and that's a long history.Simply Hoping That Humanity Will Save The Environment May Do More Harm Than Good, Experts Argue
"Instead of hope, we need to provide young people with reasons to live sustainably that are rational and effective," [Vucetich and Nelson] say. "We need to lift up examples of sustainable living motivated by virtue more than by a dubious belief that such actions will avert environmental disaster."
No comments:
Post a Comment