Prometheus » Blog Archive » FAQ to Accompany Pielke (2009) on Air Capture

In short, if air capture costs too much as an approach, then so too do other forms of mitigation, because they costs about the same. If other forms of mitigation are judged to be worth the expense, then air capture deserves more attention than it has received in the past, because its costs are in the same ball park .

Investor's Business Daily -- Blue Skies For Obama

Media: Katrina crashes into New Orleans, FEMA responds feebly and President Bush is blamed for the loss of life and limb. Winter smacks middle America, killing 55, FEMA's late again, but President Obama gets a pass.

Marlo Meets Greenpeace - Chris Horner - Planet Gore on National Review Online

No word on what disqualifies the tens of thousands of scientists who dispute Greenpeace’s hysteria, but you can bet it’s personal. Still, we’ve showed them our scientists and continue to wait for them to show us theirs. C’mon. It’s an “overwhelming majority,” isn’t it? Surely the evidence can’t be that hard to track down. Maybe the problem is that it isn’t lurking in anyone’s garbage?

A Shell Game Behind Ocean Acidification? « The Unbearable Nakedness of CLIMATE CHANGE

This is the story of how field data showing higher CO2 concentrations in the past is what probably lies behind the increasingly louder alarm calls about ocean acidification in the future.