Monday, February 23, 2009

The True Costs of EPA Global Warming... [Mackinac Center for Public Policy]
In sum, a host of complicated and redundant regulations could be applied to nearly every product, nearly every business and nearly every building in America that uses fossil fuels. The ANPR, if finalized in anything near its current form, would create an environmental regulatory scheme more costly and intrusive than all the others combined.
Wind dies in a heat wave - and wind power, too | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog
Quirk adds that to meet Kevin Rudd’s target of 20 per cent renewable energy by 2020 would require us to build the equivalent of one of these unreliable monsters every 400 metres between Perth and Sydney, and - given their unreliability - the costs become ludicrous...
Dear Mr Rudd: cool it | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog
[Australian Environment Foundation of Jennifer Marohasy petition] Global temperature increased slightly in the late 20th century and has been decreasing since 1998. Neither the warming nor the cooling is of an unusual rate or magnitude.
Cutting carbon dioxide emissions in Australia will result in no measurable change in future climate.

No comments: