Andrew Revkin is skeptical — The Climate Scam
“[M]y guess is it’d be hard to find more than a handful of scientists working on the intertwined climate and energy challenges who would say that fossil-fueled business as usual is the best approach to getting humanity through its 21st-century growth spurt in great shape”, he writes.Obama and his Chicago Climate Exchange are part of the Global Warming Hoax | Patriot's Lament
But then again, this wasn’t really the question, was it?
Call your representative and tell them to stop supporting the Global Warming HOAX and this crap with Carbon Credits and Green Energy..Climate Progress » Blog Archive » Paging Elizabeth Kolbert: The New Yorker (!) parrots right-wing talking points
Please let The New Yorker and David Owen know that you don’t think they should be contributing to humanity’s self-destruction.Skeptic's Corner: "Sounds Good to Me"
This is an example of an article that should drive thinking people insane. How can increased carbon dioxide (CO2) be bad for agriculture,? plants breathe it. Even if true how could warmer temperatures and longer growing seasons not to mention more moisture in the air be bad for agriculture?I’ll Need Some Popcorn for this Fight - Greg Pollowitz - Planet Gore on National Review Online
Wait until Democrats start making a stink when they realize bailout money is going to lawyers for the automakers who are suing to stop the new emissions laws.
No comments:
Post a Comment